Tagged: Shahrukh Khan Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • notsocynical 5:53 am on December 25, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Aditya Chopra, , Shahrukh Khan   

    Rab Ne Bana Di Jodi (Hindi) 

    Wow! I sound angry, once more: “Give me a fucking break someone from these sappy braindead Bollywood romantic dramas. Ridiculous, preposterous, IQ of sub 10, synthetic to the core with weirdly concocted conflicts and self-congratulatory rejoicing in weirder resolutions (what are these people smoking?), its retrogressive and suprisingly a painful bore. The only saving grace is Shahrukh Khan and how he brings in shades to the everyman Surinder Sahni solely through his performance. The opening 15 minutes uptil the Haule Haule song was a nice, enjoyable munch as you see this awkwardly engaged couple (in what has to be the most unsubtly obvious way) try to share common space–its all played straight but SRK’s great fun on screen with his brand of physical comedy. And then, the bomb drops. A talent hunt reality show looking for the ultimate dancing couple lands in this small town and the husband goes for a makeover (i.e. trims his moustache, gels and streaks his hair, plus wears teeny-bopper casuals) which the wife doesn’t recognise. So a conflict is created out of thin air, and you try your hardest to suspend disbelief in the girl’s and the movie’s manipulative naivete. But how? There’s no character progression, the central bimbo’s asked to played straight and being a debutante she obliges and does little else (God, in that one guest appearance song when you see actresses like Preity and Kajol jiving you know exactly what’s amiss in today’s Bollywood-that screen-chewing raw appeal in actors that would make you gulp anything they mouth on screen),  it keeps on going in circles for some godawful 3 hours for no rhyme or reason and trust me, if I see one more Bollywood movie with Shiamak Davar brand of aerobics-choreography and bimbettes + dudes forever dressed in gym shorts and push-up bras, I will rip my clothes off. Its fcking enough already, and as for Adi, how dumb do you think we are? All the while I was thinking of some deep metaphor embedded somewhere in this grossly lookist and superficial drama, but its like looking at the drain–the deeper you dig, the more black sludge you scoop out. The subtext is atrocious and you even used “seeing God in people” (your version of trying to articulate something intangible behind instant chemistry between two people) as a pivot conflict resolutor in which the girl sits hands folded in Golden Temple and just because the hubby is walking in her direction (considering she’s come with him to the temple, isn’t that the most natural thing?) pat she goes–this is who I’ll spend the life with. Please get a life! Even the worst of stinkers courtesy of your banner have had 10 times more thought in them than this stillborn nonsensical pap. 

    PS: I was just reading Khalid’s glowing review and this is something I pondered about-maybe there’s some huge metaphor in the conflict of the movie… about a common man trying hard to place himself in the fantasies of his wife… but its sorta undone by dialogue in a key scene where he says something on the lines of “my disguise and dance is for her to laugh with me, but to love me she gotta take me as I am” which is sorta conflicting considering dancing and laughing is what made the wife happy. The disguise as a leap of faith is difficult to take for the viewer because this tacky, chauvinistic, played-straight-with-an-S movie (for most parts) takes the route of a banal dance competition and doesn’t even pursue it properly (the disguised SRK is an irritating wannabe and the actor seems to have improvised on the sets recycling or pastiching his earlier goofy roles), so when the movie fails at a literal level, for me it fails on other planes too.”

     

     
  • notsocynical 2:02 am on October 20, 2006 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Isha Koppikar, , Shahrukh Khan   

    Don-The Chase Begins: Movie Review 


    Don (2006): * and 1/2

    don.jpg
    How do you go about critiquing a movie which is so mediocre it doesn’t evoke any emotion from the viewer? Having just come out of the screening, I am so numb with disappointment, that there’s neither any incentive to praise this piece of crap, nor the energy left to bash it with junky adjectives. Since when did Bollywood mainstream movies become so utterly predictable and so totally boring? Have film-makers absolutely lost the sense of having a proper graph, having good dialogue and good characterisations? Where is the integrity in the screenplay, and where’s the feel or a sense of thrill, tension, pace and seeing something that isn’t simply staged and rehearsed? And all this when its actually a remake of a decidedly over-the-top (it was the 70s) yet taut-to-the-last-scene thriller of the yesteryears. Despite all the special effects and marketing gimmickery, the new Don is proof of Hindi cinema’s storytelling quality spiralling downward with such godspeed that if a few good films don’t release fast, even the most hardcore Bollywood devotees wouldn’t touch the stuff belched out of this industry with a bargepole.

    2 hours later, after calming down a little, I was able to put together a few thoughts about why this movie simply didn’t work for me and have randomly stuffed them in a few points below:

    1. I must have repeated this line so many times reviewing the biggies from Bollywood this year (Fanaa, Phir Hera Pheri, Krrish, KANK), its probably lost all its meaning. But still I’ll say it again–Don is unpardonably boring; a staged, fake bore-a-thon that’s neither got the pace nor the tension that a good thriller so badly needs. And for a mainstream movie, that is a sin. A cardinal sin. Its a general rule that whatever it takes, your prime focus should be to involve the audience in such a way that a common thread or theme keeps them intrigued with charismatic stars; elaborate, showy dance numbers; over-the-top melodrama; plot-holes so big you can ride road-rollers in and co-incidences to drive home the point under 3 hours only adding to the fun factor.

    To start with, Don doesn’t have a common thread or theme to speak of. It starts off as a bland cat-and-mouse chase between the police and the ever-growing-self-professed-kingpin SRK, then quickly changes gears to this kingpin getting seduced and attacked by vengeance-driven women (aka Kareena and Priyanka) thanks to his itch of bumping off his right-hand men who always turn out to be seductresses’ bhais, then somewhere in between him getting bumped off and replaced by a UPite-bandwala twin by a cop (Boman Irani) who plants him as a mole in this stylised cocaine-land, and then a whole load of fuss about a CD containing all the account details and passwords of drug lords of the world the semantics of which are so braindead, my head hurts. There’s another angle of an IT security fella (Arjun Rampal) who’s had his wife and son held at ransom and when asked to rob hundreds of crores worth of diamonds, the guy obliges and gets caught by the same cop who’s leaving no stone unturned to expose the drug mafia. Unable to complete his part of the deal, Rampal’s wife is killed and his son, who’s left to fend on the streets, is adopted by the UPite bandwala twin of DON. The two big twists of the movie are *SPOILERS*–Is the cop really doing what we think he’s doing? And Is the UPIte twin of the DON really the one we think he is? I guess the tone of these two questions have given them off but since I am not recommending the movie anyways, I am not bothered. And the question really isn’t whether the two twists shock or not, its actually–do we care? The answer is a resounding no.

    2. Shahrukh Khan is hopelessly miscast as the DON. As the shaking, spindly, anorexic, and irritatingly animated ganglord he’s basically the twitching loverboy who’s seen the old Don probably too many times. Not only is the actor crippled by his own physicality (its just the wrong baritone–lines like “I’m the king” are unintentionally funny, wrong physique–even Boman Irani and Arjun Rampal look more upto the job of bashing people up and indeed kick some serious SRK-ass) which makes him look eerily like a kid playing “let’s pretend” amidst hefty men; his perpetual pouting, and hyper-expressing gives away the lines much before he’s mouthed them. And there’s simply no presence or no meany threatful menace to this Don, which is quite saddening as SRK was really in his element when he played grey in Darr and Baazigar not forgetting his hilarious yet convincing turn as Baadshah. Now, everytime the fidgety SRK attempts a swagger, its more of a catwalk, and everytime he utters the supposedly tough-yet-cool lines from the old Don, it looks like a college teenager cheesily trying to make a pass. And this when the movie isn’t even a spoof. His now-routine attempts at sauve sarcasm and rustic tomfoolery fall totally flat not because they are badly written, but because he does them in a way that shouts “Can I have some claps for what I just did?”. Of late, he’s also mistaken acting for a collage of similar windblown close-up shots of his goggled face which is becoming very tiresome to watch. Its all disheartening as this character had some brilliant scope had it been done with silent, sauve unpredictability-words this Khan has flushed down his toilet sometime in the late 90s. Compared to him, both Boman Irani and Arjun Rampal pitch in far more believable performances.

    3. The action sequences are a mess and not even remotely as swanky as the smartly edited preview would have you believe. The flash-cut-left-right-cut–centre-cut-top-flash technique sucks even the minutest bit of rawness or excitement, not to mention the fact that you see them coming much before they do. What’s even worse, when the camera remains still, the actors look like in the middle of a dance sequence than an action one (there’s a SRK-Arjun Rampal martial-art one-on-one which is possibly the fakest Bollywood fight I’ve had the oppurtunity to see. Not only are the actors unconvincing, the sound design and the camera angles are shockingly mundane). Also, the superhuman genes have been sprinkled generously to the whole male cast, and not just the hero. So there are scenes when Boman Irani, the cop, would get shot at visibly heart-level, blood would spurt out from both the holes in chest and the back and he would not only run but shout, strategise and point a pistol with both hands for the whole of the remaining sequence a hundred times before all of its conveniently forgotten.

    Then there’s this sequence where an otherwise limping Arjun Rampal who uses a walking stick trots away on top of a 300 feet high walkway’s glass roof with his son on the back. There are shots of him slipping over the parapet often, but the guy’s agility with his otherwise lifeless leg can give circus tightrope walkers some competition. Fight-or-flight reaction is the probable explanation. And the grand daddy of them all is the one where during a fight in the plane (that’s transporting Don and his company to some godforsaken land I can’t be bothered to remember), Don himself pushes the lever of the emergency exit door mid-air and gets sucked out along with the poor Irish thug who had picked a fight with him. The funnier bit is, despite free-falling without a parachute much before the Irish guy who has suspiciously managed to get sucked into open air with one, Don’s perfectly able to pick a fight mid-air, exchange a few slaps and punches, snatch the parachute away and land safely without a scratch. And I thought I was dumb at physics.

    The thing is, stunts and sequences so larger-than-life are a staple of this genre and can be easily digested if they flow with the plot or are a daredevilry showcase of a likeable character. With not even a remotest semblance of plot-graph or characters, over-ambitious scenes like these only add up the bigger joke that this movie is.

    4. The only thing that tops SRK’s hamming and the outrageously embarrasing action sequences is the background score. The monotonous techno-trance music continues to thump away carelessly and endlessly with little credence for scene or situation, timing or mood compounding the headache. The music, when re-living past melodies from the old Don, is admittedly very well-orchestrated (Yeh Mera Dil’s tempo, rhythm and mood is light years ahead in sensuality than the original while Khaike Paan Banaraswala manages to retain the rustic cheekiness with electronic beats to boot), but the original melodies are plain mediocre. And despite having such names as Saroj Khan and Farah Khan in the credits, the choreography is not only downright ordinary but sometimes even shoddily put together. And we are talking of a film-maker who gave us Woh Ladki Hai Kahaan (DCH) and Main Aisa Kyun Hoon (Lakshya).

    5. Now to my favourite part of the review–the girls. Like a good ole’ Bond movie, they look gorgeous and sumptuous, but within a defined range. Kareena would look utterly ravishing in some poses but is downright scary when she tries to overdo the come-hither-me routine (and boy does she overdo it or what!). There’s a veil of artificiality that never leaves Priyanka’s eyes for a good part of her screentime (with a character as shoddily written as hers, I wasn’t surprised) and her lollipop figure profile (large face and head atop a petite body) still freaks me out a bit , yet this talented girl thankfully puts an effort in creasing her facial muscles and selecting a better designer which helps in bailing out her performance as creditworthy overall. The one thing that Isha Koppikar always did with aplomb was move right but here not only she manages to look consistently bland, she hams like no tomorrow and her dance moves brought back some very painful memories of Manisha Koirala.

    6. Finally I am once again, for the 5th time in a single year, shocked and infuriated as to how weak this movie is, how B-grade its treatment is, how it doesn’t even have the basic ingredients of an entertainer, how it completely fails even when compared to a tackily made original let alone contemporary police-n-spy thrillers, and how it all comes from the same guy who re-wrote the format of mainstream urban Bollywood movie hardly five years back.

    I sincerely hope this movie flops miserably and leads to talented-but-now-over-confident guys like SRK and Farhan Akhtar do some soul-searching and return to their roots.

    This Don really is one big yawn.

     
    • Saawan 11:33 am on October 20, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      I’m totally disappointed that Don is so bad! :(

    • Bollywood Blogs 5:35 pm on October 20, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Your post is not visible. On my IE 6.0, it is showing black fonts on black background. I have to “slect all” the text in order to read your post. Please correct it.

    • Saawan 8:27 pm on October 20, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      @Bollywood Blogs

      You’re still stuck to IE6? Better switch to Firefox 2.0!

    • Basanti From Sholay 5:42 am on October 22, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Not read the review, will watch it tonight adn come back! :D

    • Suyog 2:57 pm on October 22, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      I thought the first half was an absolute disaster – the second half was bearable.

      And oh well, I love Priyanka :D

      Suyog

    • Aam Bhartiya Aadmi 11:46 pm on October 22, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Don the movie Hit or Flop?, well only time will answer this question. But being a hit or flop doesnot necesarliy mean that a film is good or bad, remember Mani Ratnam’s Dil se was a huge flop commercialy, even though it had King Shahrukh Khan in it and the movie was critcally acclaimed. Likewise I feel that even if this film is a hit in commercial sense it doesnot prove anything. Shahrukh is a good actor, a real genuine actor, who has come up from the ranks, acting in stage shows, tv serials etc. I feel genuine actors like Shahrukh Khan have no need to act in remake films. Farhan Akhtar is not genuine, he is in films only beacause of his daddy, so one should not expect anything better from him. The film is not only a remake of original, but the songs are also remixed, especially “Khaike Paan”, the remix version kills this song by adding english dance beats to Indian folk.

    • Basanti From Sholay 11:50 am on October 23, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      // Shahrukh Khan is hopelessly miscast as the DON.

      ABSOLUTELY TRUE!! The dialogues, “Don ko pakadna mushkil hi nahin namumkin hai” and “Don ko gyarah mulko ki police dhoondh rahi hai” are supposed to be spoken in a way as if it is a matter of fact.. and not making faces like the chimp did.

      I felt there were too many twists.. had farhan akhtar kept just hte last twist, the impact would have been much better.. it made the end look milder!

      And yes, if that cop had the disk once, (before jasjeet takes it) wouldn’t he check it? Why will he wait for jasjeet to steal it and then go back to “don” to get it back… silly sillly.. too many loopholes!

      I wish they’d keep the classics the way they are!

    • The Critic 4:10 pm on October 23, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      This site really sucks as far as reviews for commercial films are concerned
      Readers,
      First of all, I don’t agree with Karan’s opinion. I think he can’t really understand the commercial value of any film.
      I will categorize him as one of those ART films critics. Definetely his liking is towards ARTy films. Oops soory, it might have hurt you.
      I am sorry, but your taste is bit different compared to the rest of the Janta.
      I mean, looks like you have too much of negative energy around you, for the commercial films ;) .

      Frankly, I am shocked to read how you rate Farhan as a director. I mean you are taking about the director of Dil Chata Hai and Lakshya. This definetely speaks about you and your reviews.

      My suggestion. Please avoid review Hindi commercial films, just for the sake of making you site popular.
      Not your domain.

      Infact its a not that bad a movie. Farhan successfully added new look, good pace to the theme. Also great experiment with the script. However I agree to the fact that its difficult to compare this one to original DON. Acting was more impactful in the original version. This one is more stylish and more paced, less acting oriented scenes. I think initally scenes are not connected well, causing sense of week storyline, however soon movie picks up the pace. Overall, its definetely a great effort by Farhan and SRK to deliver in front of ever demanding audience.

      Recently Sony Max had been showing the original DON and frankly there were some really boring and artifical moments in original one too. Infact I wasn’t griped ever to see whole movie at a stretch.

      Rating Commercially: 4/5
      Critically : 3/5

    • karana23 4:26 pm on October 23, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Thanks a lot guys for the feedback.

      Saawan: Yea, Don is a big disappointment.

      BB: I did change the colour back to the default grey but you desperately need a browser upgrade, like Saawan pointed out.

      Basanti: Now that I know who you are (what made you go to basanti of all the names? LOL), glad to know we share an op on this piece of cr*p. Yea, and the way this guy utters this lines… seriously, a whole joke-book could be written on this new Don and SRK’s performance. That fuss about the disc did my head in too. Its so illogical and over-blown and over-long for no real reason at all. Man, I just shudder with the memory of the movie.

      Suyog: Yea, the second half was saved somewhat with the last twist and Khaike Paan Banaraswala. PC has the ability to be so much more… if only she’d stop doing these 2-bit roles with big banners.

      Aam Bharatiya Aadmi:Yea, I agree with you on the Farhan Akhtar part. The guy seriously needs to get his act together next time around else face the label of one-film-wonder throughout. And something tells me Don is going to lose money at the BO as well. Let’s see.

      Keep commenting,

      Cheers!

      Karan.

    • karana23 4:38 pm on October 23, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      To The Critic,

      Why the fuck should I care about how much money any random movie should make? Its a personal blog, and I’ll say if I’ll like a movie or not the way I want to. Simple!

      I was bored. The movie sucked. End of story. What the hell has it got to do with me if million others like it or not? Its just an opinion for god’s sake.

      You don’t like my reviews, don’t read them. No one has forced you to click on my homepage on gunpoint.

      And as for your other braindead accusations, well I don’t need to justify my choice of films to someone who leaves a comment under the alias “The Critic” and emboldens the silly mudslinging sentences thinking I would care.

      Stop taking movie reviews so personally (unless of course you are some paid mortal from the studio/producers) and get a life!

      Cheers!

      Karan.

    • Aam Bharatiya Aadmi 10:01 pm on October 25, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Don is remixed in American style, i mean look at Priyanka Chopra she looks like an American slut…..yukkkk

      The songs are also remixed in american musical instruments……i wonder when they remix the song why tabla is replaced by electronic beats which sounds totaly artifical. I mean look at the remixed song “Khaike Paan”. This was a Bihari folk song, but now the overall feel of this song is suited for dance floors hippies only.

      Globalisation means accepting American superiority in every thing we do, even in arts, culture and music. As is we dont have our own cultural identity, as if our culture is inferior to theirs. When will this slave mentality end?

    • GuNs 5:15 am on October 26, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      ROTFL…thats what you call a rip-off. LMAO, you totally ripped-off the movie man !!

      “bore-a-thon” !! LMAO again.

      “CD” ?? ITs a DVD man, DVD…Digital Versatile Disc. LMAO yet again at how often the people in the film seem to shake it in each others’ faces saying that.

      Watched the movie too. LIked the last minute twist. Otherwise, I think it had a little too many twists than I would have liked.

      -PeAcE
      –WiTh
      —GuNs

    • ajay 11:45 am on October 26, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      dear karan ..

      You went in with too much drink or too many expectations, SRK is miscast in DON – True. The songs are not choreographed well – True to an extent.

      But Farhan Akhtar has induced the right meaning to the character DON which is supposed to be invincible. By not killing the DON. And he has done well to direct a difficult movie.

      Visuals are too good. Full marks to the DOP

    • karana23 11:24 am on October 29, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Aam Bharatiya Aadmi: On quite the contrary I am not cynical of the fact that Don sports an upmarket urban look and Ms Chopra gave a hard try at looking good. So, in all the uber-Hollywood set-up, for a folk song like Khaike Paan Banaraswala to look in place, one needed electronic beats. I thought it was very enjoyable even though SRK’s Awadhi in dialogues sucked.

      Guns: Do you think I would care about the specifics of some godforsaken transaction in a movie I was a)totally bored with and b) not recommending at all. Its a case of selective amnesia that I’ve conditioned my brain to excrete unnecessary details about things I hate and in a month’s time I hope it goes deeper and makes me forget the pain I went through while sitting through all of it. LOL.

      Ajay: The character, as you say, is conceived well. But there are absolutely no dimensions that the director or SRK himself give to it. They just ham away campily from the first to the last shot turning him into a caricature. I didn’t think there was any menace, any silent unpredictability or even a hint of surprising evil stature in Don. Boman Irani’s cop character was any day better and more shocking than SRK’s don thanks to former’s underplay.

      Cheers!

      Karan.

    • jedi 4:48 am on November 10, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      LOL! Loved reading the review.

      I cant, for the life of me, understand why a reputed (supposedly) filmmaker like Farhan Akhtar would make a remake.. that too of a film like Don. Whatsmore SRK in the role of Don is just yawwwwwn!! SRK in any kind of macho role for that matter is a disaster of unimaginable proportions. Again, SRK the star might be impressive, but I still have serious doubts regarding SRK the actor. In a role as versatile as that of the DON, SRK will fall woefully short. I dont even need to see the movie to know that.

      But I must say what pisses me of more is still Farhan Akhtar. Talk about losing your way!

      jedi

    • sonia 4:03 am on November 13, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      priyanka is cute those of u dont like her are fucking bitch.

    • JV 8:29 pm on December 8, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      I am totally agree with you. You seems my kind of movie-watcher who cannot bear stupid movies. I haven’t seen the movie , but I knew it is too much hyped.

      Difficulty is with Indian movie industry that they try to justify any commercial movie by the amount spent and earned by the movie. And in Indian with population of a billon + overseas market, it is easy to get the money back with huge profit by casting SRK and HR and AB etc. But quality of movies are never prime importance for the movie maker and sadly for many crzy fans.

      And about the opinion of the Critic I find him from one of from the movie camp trying to justify commercial movies. I too dislike movies like Krissh, KANK, Dhoom 2 , DON (even without watching it). That doesnt mean I dont understand commercial movies.

      Infact Dil Chahta Hai is one of my favourite movie which good in all aspect, that too from the same director of DON.

      Karan, keep reviewing and ripping such movie blunders.

    • Vibhanshu 3:22 am on February 1, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      It’s a bad bad movie. Full Stop.

    • Tigger 10:53 pm on February 20, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      For me the film was not that bad. It has some great moments and some flat lines, but still – a good film to see a different face of SRK from time to time.

      I would see SRK as Don from other site – lets forget about the old Don (have not seen the film so it is easy for me) and take in mind what we know about the real “dons” from mafia and from other movies ; they have never been tall, dark, handsome, their attitudes were pretty sarcastic and connected to typically daily activities (eating, drinking, sleeping with women (or men) and making money). So, Srk’s don is short, ironic,concentrated on being in tip top form, behaving as a real killer that doesn’t have to use the gun to kill You, tired of the constant presence of other people who want to take his place. He has his own “world” and means of acting. I want to say that I would be pretty much scared if someone would come to me like Don came to Kareena’s man and started to talk to me like a friend with this squeezed smile on the face than ice cold face and stormy voice.
      I liked Don although I think his relations with women were pretty overexposed.

      As for the other women in Don, I will only say that Kareena should not pretend that she knows how to dance and lovely “wild cat” should take some acting lessons or at least try to close her mounth when she is playing stoned. Women were terrible in this film…

      As for the storyline, ok, I agree. it is missing a great plot, but still it is worth to see it.

      As for the stunts and phisics – seen Dhoom2 ?

      Take care

      M.

  • notsocynical 2:57 am on August 12, 2006 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , , Shahrukh Khan   

    Kabhi Alvida Naa Kehna: The review 

    Still interested in reading more about this year’s biggest pretence in the name of maturing cinema? (More …)

     
    • GuNs 6:45 pm on August 14, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      When Priety slaps Sharukh after he admits his infedility to her, a bunch of women in the theatre started clapping !!

      HUH, WTF?? Whats the relation? Feminist idiots.

      -PeAcE
      –WiTH
      —GuNs

    • karana23 9:04 pm on August 14, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Thanks guys for your feedback!

      Suyog: Thanks a lot for linking me yet again!

      Guns: That slapping scene you are talking about comes 2 hours too late in the movie. The audience is literally fed up of the condescending voiceover of SRK giving excuses and more excuses on the lines of true love etc.. for his affair with Rani’s character.

      So yea, when he opens his heart away finally to his loving wife, the audience’s empathy and sympathies are with Zinta’s character. Her slap accompanied by all the cheering in the cinema is just a proof of how faulty SRK’s characterisation is and how unconvincing his reasons ultimately are for philandering away from his marriage which Zinta’s giving her all to work.

      Cheers!

      Karan.

    • Nirwa 11:22 am on August 15, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Me is going for movie tonight, i have not read your review, will come back and then read it! :P

      I want to see the movie without any prejudice, I want to watch it myself to hate it! :P :P :P

      milte hai break ke baad!

    • Nirwa 10:14 am on August 16, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Bad movie. Period.

      No comments.

    • jEDI 9:51 am on August 17, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Kabhi Alvida na Kehna. Sounds like a load of rubbish to me. Sorry, I’m biased :P

      The idea that someone would want to sleep with SRK, wife or not, seems preposterous to me in the first place! hehe Never mind the rest of the story.

      So a lot of elaborate drama without any real foundation u say? Thanks for warning me mate!

      And as ever, a great review!

      jedi

    • Mohan 5:42 am on August 19, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      KANK has to be viewed in correct perspective to be understood. This is NOT a film about extramarital affairs. To me, this seems to be a film about the diminishing relevance and inadequacy of the nuclear family model and the concept of life-long marriage in dealing with the challenges of ‘new economy’.Viewed in this context, the film makes lot of sense and does serve a social purpose.

    • karana23 9:11 am on August 19, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Thanks a lot guys for your time once again!

      Nirwa and Nirwa: Glad you share my verdict on the movie.

      Mohan: The way I see it, the film really IS about extramarital affairs (considering the amount of time KJo spends romanticising it) and I really do wish it was more about the actual everyday problems that make a life-long commitment difficult in today’s times. That really is my main grouse… that the differences between both the couples never filter through convincingly enough. Lot of empty talk and big excuses of “true love” instead are thrown in the condescending voiceover as if adultery is the sole solution of all marital problems.

      I am all for film’s take on walking out of a failed marriage but the problem is that KJo’s version of “failed” is supremely superficial. And equally sappy and braindead is his version of how Dev and Maya fall in love. Not to forget the inexplicable apathy with which they eye their respective marriages and loving, desperate-to-make-the-marriage work spouses. All of which makes them look as nothing but selfish, self-absorbed props.

      A film can be viewed in any number of contexts once you, as a viewer, start to care about the characters and what happens to them. To me that never happened and KANK remains a case ofgood idea botched up bigtime by its messy execution and characterisation

      Cheers!

      Karan

    • karana23 11:59 am on August 19, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Jedi: From which extra-terrestrial machine do you comment man that even bereft of any links, your comments get classified as spam?!?!? LOL… yea, the movie kinda sucks quite bad. Would like to read your take on it though. Whenever you decide to commit the hara-kiri of watching it, that is.

      Thanks a lot mate for the comment. You are one of the people whose feedback I look forward to (yea yea the last line is to butter you crazy so you are forced to come back and read my gibberish LOL).

      Cheers!

      Karan

    • shree 5:04 pm on August 22, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Yes, I liked the movie. Any person you has been married 5-10yrs will understand/identify alteast parts of the film. Whether it applies to your own life or not, each character is right is his/her own way. One is about a couple whose wife is so career minded and the husband is bitter about his failure and the other is a couple who is completely out of sync with each other. One loves while the other doesn’t. On the contrary to what many ppl think, this film is not glorifying extra marital affair, but puts you in a perspective to think about the sham that sometimes ppl lead. It is better to walk away from failed marriage rather than making the other person suffer along with you. How many ppl have the guts or the means to say or do it? NOT Many. Agreed it is a little bit lengthy, but the film was very well done. Quite a bold subject for Indian audience. Looks at the real problems in marriage.

    • karana23 11:10 am on August 27, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Shree: Power to you man, if ou could empathise with the characters of the film and took home something positive. Yes, even I am of the belief too that if things aren’t working out between two people at all, going their own way is the best option. This film’s biggest undoing, for me atleast, was the conflict at heart was just not convincing. Making it seem like a 4 hr advertisement for extra-marital affairs. Wouldn’t elaborate much here as I have said all I needed to in the review. The film just didn’t work for me.

      Thanks anyways for the comment!

      Cheers!

      Karan

    • mom 8:47 am on August 29, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Hi my Son!!!
      Well!!! watched the movie finally!!
      it clearly speaks of extra marital affair.No doubt it is important to get married!…but if one is not comfortable in the realtionship…one must have the guts to speak out his/her mind to their spouse…but then again!!!will the better half have the guts to take it!!!
      What one could not figure out in the movie was the last bit..where Abhishek and Preity turn up as Devi and Devta..asking Rani to join Shahrukh…wish they had shown such positivity when they came to know about the reality!!!!would have saved us so much of trouble watching them for the next 2 hours.Karan Johar cud have given something hillarious for that period…Lol!!
      But to sum it up…One shud take the responsibilty of marriage seriously…If it is too much too handle…only then decide to quit!!!
      Lv n
      God Bless!!

    • karana23 3:04 pm on August 31, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      Hi again Mom!

      We see totally eye-to-eye on everything in this film. Which isn’t much of a surprise LOL.

      Keep commenting!

      CheerS!

    • Geeta 12:33 am on October 14, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      RUBBISH ! Waste of time & money.

    • bollywood-beauty 5:39 pm on November 3, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      i love kank and i love the bollywood actors

    • meilan 2:42 pm on November 5, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      this picture is lovely .n beautiful

    • Sreejish 10:19 am on November 10, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      The movie Really disppointed me . One of the worst that i have ever seen. Still i can’t realise that i have already watched it. poor performance by SRK and Rani. What she (Rani)was really meant for?

    • Umer Khan 8:26 am on December 31, 2006 Permalink | Reply

      All I want to say about this movie is that it is not an encourage to DIVORCE nor is it a discouragement to MARRIAGE. The only message being convyed in the film is that when you are getting married, make sure its the person you really want to marry.

      “Shaadi ki buniyaad sirf beinteha mohhabbat hone chaiye hain aur kuch nahin. Kyon ki agar buniyaad ghalat ho toh rishte toot jaate hain. Barso baad rahein mile, pyaar ki manzil bhi milein. Par aksar yeh khayal aata hai ke is pyar ki manzil par, toote hue diloon se na guzarna parta.”

      This quote is the last quote of the film, which completely summarizes the whole meaning of the film and the moral lesson.

      It is saying that they found love after a while, but all they wished was that they didnt have to go through the broken-hearts that they did. The movie’s point is to show that dont get DIVORCED, but get married to a person you really like (beinteha mohhabat) to avoid it.

      Now for people who think they know about stories and movies just because they’ve been into movies since 3 years of age. Well think again…because KANK is maybe the best film made in BOLLYWOOD and far by the most MATURE film.

      This is a complete HOLLYWOOD movie, which is the only reason why INDIANS couldnt accept it. But overseas the film had the BIGGEST OPENING EVER…which should prove something!

      • Umer Khan

      P.S. I suggest you re-watch the movie…with this point of view and thought in mind.

    • Molla 9:51 pm on February 16, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      Shahrukh Khan its hot!

    • Tigger 11:13 pm on February 20, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      one of my favourite movies.

      I have not seen whinning SRK but Dev that was left by his wife in the most important moments of his life. For most of the time we see him alone, doing things with son or going somewhere. Wife is always absent and veeery surprised when one day he encounters her by chance (and bad luck for Maya). For her he was just a football player (with a decent 5 000 000 a year), what his wife has nicely told him on their anniversary day, just after telling him that she had an offer of a better job but she – the queen – has resolved on not accepting it… great… (if I were him … arrrrgh)

      I have not seen betrayed wife but a woman that was so sure that she doesn’t have to do anything in her marriage because she was not at fault at all. Of course most of the women will sympathise with the betrayed wife… but not me. And her behaviour towards Maya at Rishi’s wedding was inacceptable (for me anyway).

      I agree with the previous comments that the film shows real life and real problems that we are are all facing in our marriages. It does not show that exmartial relations is the best solution but is shows that one day we might be facing the same challenges and problems.

      I love this cynical son of a … SRK and I adore Maya in her violet costume wanting to please her husband. The jealousy scene in Dev/Maya’s houses is brilliant.

      And if one saw deleted scenes of KANK one knows better why this film is so good…

      Take care

      Tigg

    • karem 9:57 pm on March 10, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      hola bueno solo para decir q te amo hrithik roshan y me encantaria q tu y junto a kajol rani y sharukh vengan al peru porfa es de vida o muerte

    • karem 9:58 pm on March 10, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      hola bueno soy la fan numero uno de hrithik hay te amo,kaho naa pyaar hai

    • brown tigress 7:58 pm on April 3, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      This movie by far is one of the best bollywood movies ever!!! I’m not indian, but i adore good movies, whether its in hindi, chinese, italian, whatever…

      to those who don’t like it, i can only say that u haven’t been in a situation like the characters in the movie…but the sad truth is that it is far more prominent in today’s world than u may want to think…

      i’m in a 4 year relationship right now, and this movie played a big role in the way i think…circumstances are so similar, yet i would not have the guts to do what the characters did…the point is that unless u live it, dont judge it…props to the actors, writers and producers of the movie…well doneeee

    • FORKAN 11:28 pm on April 22, 2007 Permalink | Reply

      karan johar!!! wow buen trabajo me llego al alma …………. muy buena peli…………………

  • notsocynical 3:33 pm on November 15, 2004 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Madan Mohan, , , Shahrukh Khan, Yash Chopra   

    Veer-Zaara (2004): *** 

    veer6-s.jpg

    First things first. Veer Zaara’s somewhat better than SRK’s previous three pseudo-stylish “love-legends” Main Hoon Na, Kal Ho Naa Ho and Chalte Chalte. In the same breath, let me add that the genre-defining quality of Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge and Dil To Pagal Hai this simply doesn’t have.

    The so-called epic’s tale is as simple as simple can get — love buds between a boy (SRK) and a girl (Preity Z) (here’s the clincher– “from two different countries”). At the crucial moment of boy’s proposal, the girl’s fiancee (Manoj Bajpai) enters the scene. As expected, the girl’s been engaged under much pressure from her parents (particularly her father who sees the alliance as his political-career’s springboard). This vexed fiancee and the girl’s mother (Kirron Kher) persuade and pressurise the dedicated loverboy to spend the rest of his life as a captive with a different name to shield the girl from any societal disgrace and the loverboy agrees. Yes, you heard it right– he agrees without as much of a frown here and a pout there. Fast forward to 22 years… while the loverboy graduates to being a mute lovelorn oldie in the cell, the girl’s life is a mystery. Things are set right by a die-hard feminist-cum-lawyer Saamiya (Rani) and all’s well that ends well.

    There are so few things that work for Veer Zaara. And there are so many that just don’t. Let’s get over with the positives first:

    It doesn’t burn the screen, but SRK-Preity chemistry is warm and simmering alright. Both the actors have been given minimal dialogues (I say kill the screenplay and the dialogue writer!), but right from the yearning expressions of the lovelorns to the raw passions of lovers- they both get everything damn right. It won’t be wrong to quote that its all thanks to these two actors that I could survive this painfully stretched flick.

    Preity-dimples-to-die-for-Zinta finally graduates to being the archetypal Hindi film heroine in this dreamy-surreal avatar. The coyness, the innocence, the anguish, the dilemma… everything’s seeped in dollops of nubile feminity which was so missing in her previous performances. With none of those tomboyish in-your-face antics (which so killed her performance in Kal Ho Naa Ho) and free of those look-at-my-gait-and-my-cleavage-and-my-hour-glass-figure antics (so very present in every other actress in the industry today), Zinta makes for one hell of a Zaara.

    As Veer, even the otherwise high-on-hamming-and make-up Shahrukh pitches in a controlled performance. All compliments aside, seeing him making a false thick baritone whenever asked to mouth the Punjabi dialogues made me laugh.

    Speaking of Punjabi dialogues, its Amitabh Bachchan who gets them right to the last syllable in his gazzillionth special appearance. Supremely endearing as the rustic “jatt”, his moments with his screen-wife Hema Malini are some of the few watchable ones in the film.

    For once, the Chopras aren’t obsessed with Switzerland, England, Italy, GAP, Gucci, Nike and the works. If there is someone who has really relaxed, its costume stylist Manish Malhotra and production designer Sharmishtha Roy. Ironically enough, these two names are why Yash Chopra’s last film Dil to Pagal Hai is still talked about. Clearly, this time around the director isn’t keen on giving his “love-legend” a radical look and resorts to “punjab ke khet”, “punjab ke gaanv”, “lahore ke bazaar” and its quite relaxing to see SRK finally don a dirty blanket in the cell rather than some faded Adidas trousers.

    A stray subplot of women’s education in rural India comes across brilliantly as we see Zaara dedicating her 22 years constructively towards village people. I expected her to cry herself to death in some kaal-kothri like SRK!

    The film boasts of three bewitching melodies — Do Pal Ruka, Tere Liye and Main Yahaan Hoon and all three have been sewn in the screenplay with fantastic timing and feel.

    So where does the film falter?

    As if you haven’t yet realised, Veer-Zaara is basically a Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge hybrid with the India-Pakistan dosti angle thrown in. The only thing that the film’s nonsensical screenplay can actually boast as its “own” is the redemptory stretch of 22 years during which the lovers live separately. Or probably I am wrong. Even this 22 year angle is lifted from Yash Chopra’s very own “Waqt” (a Balraj Sahni multistarrer of the ’70s). So this otherwise 3 hour long saga is basically a collection of some forced songs and some forced scenes.

    The Preity-SRK love story though kept aloft by the lead pair’s performances is jeopardised heavily by cliched sequences and umpteen number of songs. Both Veer and Zaara are your typical do-gooders, think-gooders, sacrificial lambs who are trampled under the feet of the cruel society (sob sob).

    The DDLJ hangover is so strong and so obvious in every damn scene that one wonders if Sr. Chopra has actually lost it as a film-maker. You can’t help but go back to Kajol prancing about in the rain in “Mere Khwabon Mein” as Preity wiggles about in “Hum To Bhai Jaise Hain” (albeit in ahem ahem salwar-kameezes). In fact the resemblance is so uncanny that even a sequence in choreography is there (Kajol woken up-Preity woken up, Kajol bathing-Preity bathing, Kajol in rain-Preity in rain). Seriously, can’t we have a different way to introduce the heroine? The song-borrowing from DDLJ carries on with “Aisa Desh Hai Mera” and “Do Pal” feeling more and more like “Ghar Aaja Pardesi” and “Ho Gaya Hai Tujhko To Pyar” with every passing shot.

    And it doesn’t end there. The whole SRK-falling-for-already-engaged Zinta, Zinta realising her love for SRK after he leaves; the corny, tear-jerking dialogues between SRK and Zinta’s mother Kirron Kher when Mrs Kher pleads to SRK to leave Zinta; and even the characters– Zinta’s slimy fiancee and intolerant father… its all so damn DDLJ and so damn repetitive. Simply goes on to confirm what our mainstream Hindi cinema has finally become– a recycling factory.

    I wouldn’t even hesitate accusing the SRK-coming-back-for-Zinta sequence for being a photocopy of the SRK-winning-Kajol sequence in DDLJ. Its just the geography of the matters stopping me in doing so. In DDLJ, our SRK had to traverse some many thousand miles from London to a village in Punjab. Veer Zaara sees him travelling from the Punjab village to Lahore in Pakistan.

    Which basically leaves us with two minute novel “issues” that the film so forcibly tries to address– one’s of “women’s status in today’s society” and the other is of “Indo-Pak friendship”. Let’s see how touchingly these two “issues” come across–

    The “women’s status in today’s society” angle comes across through this headstrong lawyer called Saamiya whose dialogues are written more for the seetis and taalis of the frontbenchers. In fact there’s a noticeable trend you notice as Ms Saamiya Siddiqui pouts a humanitarian dialogue, swashes around and then catwalks as the just-outsmarted opponent looks on, mouth wide open. This trend is noticed everywhere… whether this smug-with-righteousness is talking to a police officer, replying to her opposition… its so in-your-face and so spoonfed, it makes you crack up. Like with all the other characters, Saamiya’s character lacks any real depth and however hard the- otherwise-efficient Rani Mukherjee tries, this Chopra-brand underdog is nowhere near to Karisma’s Nisha of Dil To Pagal Hai or Vinod Khanna of Chandni.

    The “Indo-Pak friendship” angle is conveyed through lyrics like “jaisa desh hai mera, waisa desh hai tera” or dialogues like “Mere bharat ki izzat ka sawaal tha, aata kaise nahin” or “Yeh ek pakistani ka waada hai”. In fact, its hilarious as lovers boast more about their countries in their few moments together than talk about themselves (no wonder Preity forgets to tell SRK that she’s engaged.

    Some of the characters suck so much, they actually end up funny. Take Zinta’s father for instance– poor man gets such a massive shock on hearing about Zinta’s affair, he ends up on a death-bed. Its another thing that the very next shot sees him stripped off all the ventilators etc and smiling as Zinta nods to the alliance. Ditto for Zinta’s maid (Divya Dutta) who speaks in a hybridised cockney-Kabuli-Punju-Hindi dialect. While I am at it, there’s no explanation given as to why Manoj Bajpai lets SRK rot in the jail when Zinta doesn’t marry him. If only Mr Chopra didn’t spend so much screen time on songs like “Lodi” and “Hawa”, maybe I would have got some clues.

    Moral of the story– If in love, get ready to be a sissy. Get ready to be ordered around to spend the rest of your life in captivity if need arrives, for all you do care about is your lover’s respect in society. (My take– f*ck this society.. stand up to your love!)

    Finally– Go watch Veer Zaara. Just don’t presume it to be a love-story of this planet– the world (read India and Pakistan) and its people are nowhere as black and white as the film shows them.

    In the closing shots, as Saamiya utters “Jaane yeh Veer aur Zaara kahaan se aaye hain… zaroor khuda ke bande hain”, I couldn’t agree more.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.